Complex Fractions --
Part I
Intermediate
Algebra: One Step at a Time. Pages
196-200: #6, 7, 9, 17, 18, 19, 21, 26, 28.
College
Algebra: One Step at a Time. Pages 57-62:
#6, 7, 9, 17, 18, 19, 21, 26, 28.
Please see
Part II for
additional exercises!!
Dr. Robert J. Rapalje
Seminole State College of Florida
Sanford, FL 32773
Problems #1-10 are all similar, in that they consist of
a single fraction divided by a single fraction. This is a great opportunity
to try out Method I, which I call the “Unstacking Method.” All you do is
just “unstack” the fraction and write it as a “division” problem!
6.
Solution:
The first step is to "un-stack" the
problem:
=
Just invert the second fraction, and multiply:
=

Divide out factors of any numerator with corresponding
factors from the denominators. In particular, divide out the factors of
3, 2,
, and y:
=
= 
=

7.
Solution:
The first step is to "un-stack" the
problem:
=
Just invert the second fraction, and multiply. While you are at it, factor
what can be factored:
=

Divide out factors of any numerator with corresponding factors from the
denominators. In particular, divide out the factors of 4 and (x
− 4) :
=
9.
Solution:
Of course, as before, the first step is to just “un-stack” the problem:
=
Just invert the second fraction, and multiply. While you are at it, factor
what can be factored. Notice that the first numerator is the difference of
cubes. In the second fraction, the denominator is a difference of squares.
Be careful! The numerator does NOT factor!!
=

= 
Divide out factors of any numerator with corresponding factors from the
denominators. In particular, divide out the factors of
and
(x + 2) . Only the two factors of
remain.
=
17.
Method I:
Both methods work equally well here, but a lot
of students just prefer the “unstacking” method, until there is time to see
some of the advantages of Method II. This explanation will use Method I.
= 
You
must find the LCD for the fractions on the left side
(RED), which is
,
and an LCD for the fractions on the right side
(BLUE)
, which is
.
You will have to play “what’s missing” in these fractions.



Invert the
second fraction, factoring the difference of squares in the second fraction.

Divide out
an x from the first denominator with the x in
the second numerator, and divide out the (2+x) factors. What
is left is
The final
answer is: 
18. Method I:
Both methods work equally well
here, but a lot of students just prefer the “unstacking” method, until there
is time to see some of the advantages of Method II. This explanation will
use Method I.
= 
You
must find the LCD for the fractions on the left side
(RED), which is
, and an LCD for the fractions on the right side
(BLUE) ,
which is
. You will have to play “what’s missing in these
fractions.



Factor the
first numerator, and invert the second fraction.

Divide out
an x from the first denominator with the x in
the second numerator, and divide out the (1-x) factors. What
is left is
or

19. Method II:
The LCD for the whole problem
is
, so multiply numerator and denominator by
.
= 
= 
Although
this looks terrible, it is really quite simple, and you can do it in your
head. Normally, you don’t even write down the previous step. It all
simplifies to this:
=

Combine
like terms in numerator and denominator:
=

Factor the
common factor within the numerator and the denominator:
=

Reduce the
fraction by dividing out the ( x − 4) factor:
=
.
21. Method II:
The LCD for the whole problem
is
, so multiply numerator and denominator by
.
= 
= 
As in the previous problem,
although this looks terrible, it is really quite simple, and you can do it
in your head. Normally, you don’t even write down the previous step. It
all simplifies to this:
= 
Factor the numerator and
denominator:
=
Reduce the fraction by dividing
out the ( 2x − 1) factor:
=
.
21. Method
I: The “unstacking method”.
= 
Find
the LCD for the RED
part (which is
),
and the LCD for the BLUE
part (which is also
).
Multiply each fraction by the “missing” factors:
=

= 
=

=

Divide out
the factors of (2x-1) and
,
and the final answer is, as it was by Method II,
= 
26.

Solution:
Use Method I (the "unstacking"
method!!)
=
The
LCD for the first (red) part is x+1.
The second
(blue) part is a single fraction, so you
don’t even need a common denominator!! Express the red
part as a single fraction:
=
= 
= 
Combine
like terms in the first fraction, and invert the second fraction:
= 
Divide out
factors of any numerator with corresponding factors from the denominators.
In particular, divide out the factors of (2x+1):
=

28. Method
I:
Solution:
Start by "un-stacking" the fraction:
=
The
LCD for the first (red)
part is x−1,
for the
second (blue)
part is x+4,
so multiply numerator and denominator of
each fraction by the appropriate missing factors:
=
= 
Put each
of these LCDs in place:
=

Multiply
out the numerators:
=

Combine
like terms for each of the numerators:
=

Factor the
numerators (if possible!), invert the second fraction, and multiply:
=

Divide out
factors of any numerator with corresponding factors from the denominators.
In particular, divide out the factors of (x+1):
=

For additional
exercises, please see
Complex Fractions
Part II.
Return to main page
Math in Living
C
O
L O
R
!!
Return to Basic Algebra page
Return to Intermediate Algebra page
Return to
College Algebra page